.Verhaal aanpassen
.
It would have been quite natural
that any expected Messiah be retrospectively legitimized
by his followers as the Son of David.
On the other hand,
it has become clear that in Yeshu's time
there were indeed many real descendants from the family of the famous King David
[as there are today many descendants
of men like Charlemagne].
In recent years
there has even been found an ossuary designated for the bones
of one from the "House of David". So, knowledge that one was from the family of David would not necessarily legitimize a person
for messianic claims.
It is important to reiterate,
moreover, that even though there were those in the first century who could trace their lineage to David,
we cannot be certain that Yehoshua himself belonged to David's line. Since Matai and Luke provide the Davidic genealogy of Yeshua, it is no surprise that it is they
who set the place of his birth in Beth Lechem,
the city of David's birth.
Nevertheless
here the two accounts display important differences.
According to Luke 2:4, Jesus' family traveled to Beth Lechem only because of the census.
Before the birth of JC, they lived in Natseret
to which they returned.
According to Matai 2:23, however,
the family resided in Beth Lechem in Yehudah/Judea before the birth of
Jesus and settled in Natseret only
after their return from Egypt.
It would seem, then,
that both the tradition that JC was born in Beth Lechem,
and the proof of his Davidic ancestry, arose [mainly] because many believed
that the Messiah would be of David's line and would, like David,
be born in Beth Lechem.
This follows plainly
from Yochanan 7:41-42.
The passage tells of some who denied that Jesus was the Messiah, saying,
"Is the Christ to come from Galilee? Has not the scripture said that the Christ is descended
from David, and comes from Beth Lechem,
the village where David was?"
Yochanan, therefore,
knew neither that Yeshu had been born in Beth Lechem,
nor that he was descended
from David.
At the same time,
this incident shows how
people demanded the fulfillment
of these two conditions
as legitimization of
the messianic
claim.
We
mogen dus
onderscheid leren maken
tussen bijgeloof &
'echt geloof'.
Slaap zacht,
droom zoet &
tell us all about
it if you really want
to do so: geloven
staat vrij &
't weigeren
erbij
...
It would have been quite natural
that any expected Messiah be retrospectively legitimized
by his followers as the Son of David.
On the other hand,
it has become clear that in Yeshu's time
there were indeed many real descendants from the family of the famous King David
[as there are today many descendants
of men like Charlemagne].
In recent years
there has even been found an ossuary designated for the bones
of one from the "House of David". So, knowledge that one was from the family of David would not necessarily legitimize a person
for messianic claims.
It is important to reiterate,
moreover, that even though there were those in the first century who could trace their lineage to David,
we cannot be certain that Yehoshua himself belonged to David's line. Since Matai and Luke provide the Davidic genealogy of Yeshua, it is no surprise that it is they
who set the place of his birth in Beth Lechem,
the city of David's birth.
Nevertheless
here the two accounts display important differences.
According to Luke 2:4, Jesus' family traveled to Beth Lechem only because of the census.
Before the birth of JC, they lived in Natseret
to which they returned.
According to Matai 2:23, however,
the family resided in Beth Lechem in Yehudah/Judea before the birth of
Jesus and settled in Natseret only
after their return from Egypt.
It would seem, then,
that both the tradition that JC was born in Beth Lechem,
and the proof of his Davidic ancestry, arose [mainly] because many believed
that the Messiah would be of David's line and would, like David,
be born in Beth Lechem.
This follows plainly
from Yochanan 7:41-42.
The passage tells of some who denied that Jesus was the Messiah, saying,
"Is the Christ to come from Galilee? Has not the scripture said that the Christ is descended
from David, and comes from Beth Lechem,
the village where David was?"
Yochanan, therefore,
knew neither that Yeshu had been born in Beth Lechem,
nor that he was descended
from David.
At the same time,
this incident shows how
people demanded the fulfillment
of these two conditions
as legitimization of
the messianic
claim.
We
mogen dus
onderscheid leren maken
tussen bijgeloof &
'echt geloof'.
Slaap zacht,
droom zoet &
tell us all about
it if you really want
to do so: geloven
staat vrij &
't weigeren
erbij
...
23 aug 2009 - bewerkt op 24 aug 2009
- meld ongepast verhaal
Log in om een reactie te plaatsen.
- O 20 apr 2023 44281 260 Er waren volop armen in de stad en op de
- O 20 apr 2023 44280259Hoogstmerkwaardig hoeveel soorten dromen &
- O 19 apr 2023 44279258OudeLiedjes,JoligeMelodietjes,MallePietjes
- O 19 apr 2023 44278 257 Zo’n 400 jaar later, in 386 na Chr./A.D.
- O 19 apr 2023 44277Knijp droog, verdeel, heers & pest maar raak?
- O 19 apr 2023 44276256Ondergronds, uit ‘t licht, was geen moeite
- O 19 apr 2023 44275 255 Nòg frappanter (tenminste, voor wie niet
- O 18 apr 2023 44274 254 In Vigna Randanini zijn echter kochiem
- O 18 apr 2023 44273 253 I/d 2e/3e eeuw, toen twee rivaliserende
- O 17 apr 2023 44268252 Vroege synagogen waren dus zeker geen
- O 17 apr 2023 44267 251 De namen i/d Misjna zíjn die van wijzen
- O 16 apr 2023 44266 Met àndere woorden: de prachtige, overvolle
- O 16 apr 2023 44265 250 De tekens die om een menselijke figuur
- O 16 apr 2023 44264249 Áán ‘t uiteinde v/d synagogevloer die het
- O 16 apr 2023 44263 248 Geen v/d voorstellingen was willekeurig