jbml thln 60 in other cases, initiative & response
ARE
HANDLED SEPARATELY,
SO THAT THE USER'S EMAILPROGRAM
MUST SEND AND RECEIVE EMAIL VIA DISTINCT SOFTWARE ENTITIES
THAT OFTEN OPERATE BY COMMECTING TO DIFFERENT REMOTE MACHINES?
The computer's software-based abilities are usually divided into Client Programs
that request and accept services from other programs {often at the behest of a user},
& Server Programs that accept these requests & provide an appropriate service!
At the human level, when Martin at computer A sends email to Jonathan at computer B containing the line 'I am happy to speak to you' & Jonathan replies, 'And I am happy to speak to you,' we easily sort out the meaning of the words "I" & "You" in this polar relationship from context!? But, even in the siMplest case in which both computers handle their own email delivery (without relying on external ser-vice providers, as most private internet users must do), the relay of the messages & reply involves six steps among four connected but independently functioning software entities. [Here again I, Mor, have to skip some stuff because it seems to boring to me with all these computers speaking to each other through delivery of email message & delivery of email reply via A><B vice versa {123456}!] These features of the internet ~ the division of client & server functions into separate software entities & the consistent use of third person identification ~ are not necessary requirements of the machine communication, but are intended to make the Internet a robust "open system" in which machines can communicate without any prior formal acquaintance. Many common systems function by invoking first & second person formulations, so that for example, if Martin's computer & Jonathan's computer have been properly introduced to one an-other, they can exchange email messages by respectively announcing, "I have an email message for you," & "I have a reply message for you,"!? In that case, in any message arriving on a network cable, the word 'I' refers to the sender & 'You' refers to the software that accepts the message, while the opposite associations hold for messages leaving leaving on the network cable. Nevertheless, it would be an unreasonable stretch to argue that the computer invoking the word "I" has unified its fragmented experience into a consistent subjective ego. [I, Mor, hate it when 'advertisementprograms' 'talk' to me all the time by pretending I need their commercial offers ...]!
HANDLED SEPARATELY,
SO THAT THE USER'S EMAILPROGRAM
MUST SEND AND RECEIVE EMAIL VIA DISTINCT SOFTWARE ENTITIES
THAT OFTEN OPERATE BY COMMECTING TO DIFFERENT REMOTE MACHINES?
The computer's software-based abilities are usually divided into Client Programs
that request and accept services from other programs {often at the behest of a user},
& Server Programs that accept these requests & provide an appropriate service!
At the human level, when Martin at computer A sends email to Jonathan at computer B containing the line 'I am happy to speak to you' & Jonathan replies, 'And I am happy to speak to you,' we easily sort out the meaning of the words "I" & "You" in this polar relationship from context!? But, even in the siMplest case in which both computers handle their own email delivery (without relying on external ser-vice providers, as most private internet users must do), the relay of the messages & reply involves six steps among four connected but independently functioning software entities. [Here again I, Mor, have to skip some stuff because it seems to boring to me with all these computers speaking to each other through delivery of email message & delivery of email reply via A><B vice versa {123456}!] These features of the internet ~ the division of client & server functions into separate software entities & the consistent use of third person identification ~ are not necessary requirements of the machine communication, but are intended to make the Internet a robust "open system" in which machines can communicate without any prior formal acquaintance. Many common systems function by invoking first & second person formulations, so that for example, if Martin's computer & Jonathan's computer have been properly introduced to one an-other, they can exchange email messages by respectively announcing, "I have an email message for you," & "I have a reply message for you,"!? In that case, in any message arriving on a network cable, the word 'I' refers to the sender & 'You' refers to the software that accepts the message, while the opposite associations hold for messages leaving leaving on the network cable. Nevertheless, it would be an unreasonable stretch to argue that the computer invoking the word "I" has unified its fragmented experience into a consistent subjective ego. [I, Mor, hate it when 'advertisementprograms' 'talk' to me all the time by pretending I need their commercial offers ...]!
09 mrt 2013 - bewerkt op 11 mrt 2013
- meld ongepast verhaal
Log in om een reactie te plaatsen.
- O 01 dec 2025 50214 50 ‘t Christendom drong zodoende door tot in
- O 01 dec 2025 50213 49 4 De WET: Sjaoel Paulos en zijn gevolg
- O 30 nov 2025 50212 Al eerder, aan het begin van zijn optreden,
- O 30 nov 2025 50211 Na de terechtstelling van YOCHANAN wees YESJ
- O 30 nov 2025 50210 Zoals we zagen, dachten veel mensen dat Yoch
- O 29 nov 2025 50209 Nu begrijpen we waarom het antwoord van Yesj
- O 29 nov 2025 50208 48 ‘n Middeleeuwse Commentator, David Kimchi
- O 29 nov 2025 50207 Volgens YESJ was YOCH een profeet of zo wilt
- O 29 nov 2025 50206 47 ‘t Riet overleeft de storm omdat ‘t buigt
- O 29 nov 2025 50205 46 Martin Buber heeft eens gezegd dat
- O 28 nov 2025 50204 Toen Yochanans zendboden vertrokken om Yèsj’
- O 28 nov 2025 50203 Die Woorden v/d Profeet klinken ook door i/d
- O 28 nov 2025 50202 Bovenop die wonderbaarlijke genezingen geeft
- O 28 nov 2025 50201/45 Volgens Lucky Luke 10:18 zei YESJ ooit: …
- O 28 nov 2025 50200 ‘t Is belangrijk dat YESJ die vraag van deze