db 148/187 Jewish Gospel/Jewish Christ: it should


BE
NOTED THAT
IN SOME RESPECTS
THE MATTHEAN PARALLEL GOES
IN QUITE A DIFFERENT DIRECTION
FROM MARK, ESPECIALLY BY LEAVING OUT
THE CRUCIAL "IT IS WRITTEN" STATEMENTS
IN BOTH INSTANCES!

THERE IS NO MIDRASH IN MATTHEW HERE AT ALL?
IF JOEL MARCUS AND DANNY BOYARIN ARE RIGHT,
THEN MARK IS MUCH CLOSER TO A JEWISH HERMENEUTICAL FORM THAN MATTHEW
AT THIS POINT!

Yochanan/John
the Baptist's suffering
becomes a type of the suffering that the Son of Man
also will undergo [as most prophets do!],
& the disciples are answered in both
of their questions.

Yesh/Yeshu/Yeshua/Yehoshua haMashiach
aka Jesus Christ is shown here, as also in the halakhic discussions that we have encountered several times previously,
besting the scribes/Sadducees & the pharisees
at their own game
of midrash!

The idea
of the suffering
of the Son of Man
is anything but an alien import into Judaism;
in fact, it is its very vocation.

IT
IS HERE
PERHAPS liefdesverdriet MORE
THAN ANYWHERE ELSE IN THE GOSPEL OF MARK
THAT WE SEE ITS BACKGROUND IN THE JEWISH MODE
OF BIBLICAL INTERPRETATION,
MIDRASH.
ONCE AGAIN,
TO REMIND READERS,
MIDRASH IS A WAY OF MULTIPLY CONTEXTUALIZING VERSES
WITH OTHER VERSES AND PASSAGES IN THE BIBLE,
IN ORDER TO DETERMINE
THEIR MEANING.

Wat
Mor betreft:
voor mij staan
ook deze twee (YOCH & YESH)
op ongeveer dezelfde paden in bijna dezelfde belichtingen
als al hun voorgangers & navolgelingen (& ieder van ons) als
"Adam/Eva"/"Kajin/Abel"/Avram/Yitschak/Ya'akov/Yoseef/Moshe/profeten
& Dawiedewiedewied/Sjlomomon
dus OOK 'n 'Esther & Mordechai'
met al hùn (òns)
'vallen &
opstaan'
...
02 mrt 2013 - bewerkt op 04 mrt 2013 - meld ongepast verhaal
Weet je zeker dat je dit verhaal wilt rapporteren? Ja | Nee
Profielfoto van Asih
Asih, man, 80 jaar
   
Log in om een reactie te plaatsen.   vorige volgende