100 jbml thln as I admitted earlier


THE DETAILED CONSIDERATION
OF HOW PHYSICAL THEORY DESCRIBES THE MICROSCOPIC EVLUTION OF SPACE-TIME EVENTS IS SOMETHING OF A NARROW SPECIALIZATION, PRIMARELY INTENTED TO CONSTRUCT AT A MORE COHERENT DESCRIPTION OF RELATIVISTIC DYNAMICS.

MEANWHILE, THE VARIOUS FORMULATIONS LEAD TO EMPIRICALLY INDISTINGUISHABLE RESULTS, AND NO WELL-
established theory permitting specific, reliable predictions about such exotic questions as time travel or highly complex chronologies has been singled out.

Consequently, the discussion of historical or chronological time versus coordinate time can only present the ingredients of a reasonable physical model. In this model, as you successfully grasped, the historical time specifies chronological order of events as they unfold, and the specification of chronology is essentially equivalent to announcing a causal principle: no event can affect a chronologically prior event.

Chronological order is therefore more fundamental than the concept of spatial and temporal location in space-time, which is ultimately a double abstraction, first from separation of events to Cartesian coordinates, and second from coordinates to the "empty arena" of physical interaction. When the words past and present refer to chronology, they describe non-overlapping psysical environments,
but when they refer to coordinate time, they describe a kind of separation
between possible interacting events at a
given chronological
moment.
17 mrt 2013 - bewerkt op 18 mrt 2013 - meld ongepast verhaal
Weet je zeker dat je dit verhaal wilt rapporteren? Ja | Nee
Profielfoto van Asih
Asih, man, 81 jaar
   
Log in om een reactie te plaatsen.   vorige volgende