lijntrekken diepduiken hoogvliegen handlangen e.d.


Misschien is de meest kenmerkende typisch menselijke gewoonte wel 't trekken van lijnen naar buiten?

Een verband leggen tusen 't ene & 't andere: & van 't een komt 't ander, zodat je 't herhaalt & wilt blijven uitproberen met al 't andere dat je tegenkomt gedurende je leven zoals hout, klei & stenen?

Ik doe in m'n mydiverhaaltjes niet veel anders dan dat: verband leggen tussen mijn nu & mijn verleden ~ van daaruit komen we dan haast automatisch bij 'de toekomst' ~ ook dit verdelen & ontleden hoort erbij!!!

Terug dus maar naar de eerste martelaars, gijzelaars, leerlingen, volgelingen, z.g. discipelen & apostelen!


I would suggest the following tentavive model for thinking about the historical processes of cultural interaction that issued in the full-fledged martyrological literature of both late antique Judaism and Christianity.

The earliest "Jewish" and "Christian" sources for martyrdom, as has been pointed out,
are very similar in their milieux and structure. Both 4 Maccabees and the earliest contemporary Christian martyr texts draw heavily on the earliest Jewish rudimentary martyrologies
of the pre-Christian 2 Macca-bees.

Moreover, there are important similarities between 4 Maccabees itself and early Christian martyrologies that suggest shared innivatin. Furthermore, as has been shown, early Jewish martyr texts and the
Martyrium Polycarpi both make heavy use of the Sacrifice of Yitschak and midrashic connections to the Passover in their imagery.

'THE MOST CAUTIOUS ASSESSMENT
WOULD CONCLUDE THAT RATHER THAN THE CHRISTIAN USE OF THE STORY
BEING ADOPTED FROM AND USED IN POLEMIC AGAINST A FULLY FLEDGED EARLIER JEWISH DOCTRINE,
THE TWO DEVELOPED IN SOME FORM OF INTERACTION WITH EACH OTHER,
PROBABLY DURING THE SECOND CENTURY.

AT SOME STAGE IN THIS DEVELOPMENT
THE "ISAAC STORY" BECAME ASSOCIATED WITH THE PASSOVER,
AN ASSESSION WE FIND IN THE TARGUMS AND ALSO IN MELITO, BUT AGAIN IT IS A MATTER OF DEBATE HOW FAR THIS WAS A JEWISH RESPONSE TO CHRISTIAN UNDERSTANDING OF THE DEATH OF YEHOSHUA, WHOSE PASSOVER LINKS WERE FIXED, RATHER THAN PART OF ITS INSPIRATION.

IT WAS A DIALOGUE WHICH WAS TO CONTINUE:
RABBINIC ELABORATION OF THE TRADITION BECOMES INCREASINGLY DETAILED WITH SURPRISING ECHOES OF CHRISTIAN IDEAS, WHILE CHRISTIAN AUTHORS ALSO USED THE STORY IN THEIR OWN INTERESTs, AS WHEN APOLLINARUS DESCRIBES YESHUA
AS THE TRUE PASCHA, 'THE BOUND ONE
WHO BOUND THE STRONG'
[Matai 12.29]!

O EICH YOECHAL IESJ LAVO LEVEIT HAGIEBOR WELIEGOL ET-KEELAW IEM-LO YE'ESOD BARIESJONAH
ET-HAGIEBOR WE'ACHAR YIESJSEH ET-BEITO?

engel
07 jan 2010 - bewerkt op 07 jan 2010 - meld ongepast verhaal
Weet je zeker dat je dit verhaal wilt rapporteren? Ja | Nee
Profielfoto van Asih
Asih, man, 81 jaar
   
Log in om een reactie te plaatsen.   vorige volgende