De enige echte originele Yehosjoea
moet wel een bijzonder interessant, boeiend & indrukwekkend persoon zijn geweest in die tijd op die plaats ondanks alle overdreven ophemelarij
& heidense lariekoek?!!
For
Jewish Christianity -
even in later centuries
when in general the church regarded Jewish Christianity's view as heretical -
Yeshua's role as miracle-worker, teacher, prophet, & Messiah was more important than
"the risen Lord of the kerygma."
At an early date,
the emphasis began to change among the Hellenistic Christian congregations
founded by Greek Jews and composed predominantly of non-Jews. In these congregations,
redemption through the crucified and risen Christ became the heart of [their] preaching.
It is no accident that the writings originating in these communities ~ dor example, the letters of "Saint Paul" ~ scarcely mention the life
and preaching
of Yeshu.
It is perhaps a stroke of luck,
as far as our knowledge of JC is concerned,
that the Synoptic Gospels were written fairly late - apparently around [& after] 70 AD -
when the dynamic creativity within the Pauline congregations had diminished. For the most part,
this later stratum of the synoptic tradition found its first expression
that it is concerned NOT with kerymatic statements,
but with Christian platitudes.
Is it indeed credible
to suggest that when the Synoptic Gospels are studied scientifically
they present a reliable portrayal of the historical Jesus,
in spite of the kerygmatic
preaching of faith
by the church?
My research
{DF} has led me to the conclusion
that the Synoptic Gospels are based upon one or more non-extant early documents
composed by Yeshu's disciples and the early church in Yerushalayim: these texts were originally written
in Hebrew. Subsequently they were translated into Greek
and passed through various
stages of redaction.
It is the Greek translation
of these early Hebrew sources that were employed by our three Euangelists,
thus, when studied in the light of their real Jewish background, the Synoptic Gospels do preserve
a picture of Yehoshua that is more reliable
than is generally acknowledged.
Het gaat mij dus vooral
om 't origineel & pas in de tweede plaats
om wat er uit geworden is na het neerslaan van de opstand tegen de Romeinen,
Grieken, heidenen & betweterige heetgebakerde koekebakkers uit de goyiem:
ons hier en nu krijgt alleen maar waardevoller diepte & zin
als we het kunnen plaatsen tussen het verleden
en de toekomst.
Wereldburgerschap
& 't verwerkelijken van mensenrechten komen niet
zomaar uit de lucht vallen, maar hebben een voorgeschiedenis van [minstens] tweeduizend jaar
via al die locale gebeurtenissen in de
eerste helft van
die 'eerste
eeuw'.
Het
perspectief van
't "spoor terug"
voert ons
't verst
vooruit
...
