Left with the gospels: they present their own set
OF ALMOST 2000 YEAR OLD PROBLEMS FOR MANY PRESENT DAY 'MODERN' PEOPLE FROM ALL OTHER COUNTRIES & strange places ~!
To begin with (Reza Aslan@XXVI), with the possible exception of the gospel of Luke, none of these stories we have were written by the person after whom they are named?
That actually is true of most of the books in the NOT: such so-called pseudoepigraphical works, or works attributed to but not written by a specific author, were extremely common in the ancient world and should by no means be thought of as forgeries!
Naming a book after a person was a standard way of reflecting that person's beliefs or representing his or her school of thought.
Regardless, these gospels are not, nor we're they ever meant to be, a historical documentation of Yehoshua's life: these are not eye-witness accounts of YESHUA's Words & Deeds recorded by people who knew him; they are testimonies of FAITH composed by communities of faith & written many years after the events they pretend to describe?!
Simply put: the gospel (euangels) tell us about Yesh the Christ, Messiah, prophet, son of man & therefore also 'child of g d' like àll of us ...
Net zoals ieder myDi'ertje zingt, spreekt, loopt, leert, werkt, doet, laat & uitprobeert: zo (ongeveer) óók presenteerde Yesj zich als ont-dekkingsreiziger, herder- & bouwvakker, klusjes- & timmerman, zwerver & boer, zoon, neef, oom, zwager (?) van mensen zoals 'wij'; vandaar dat we na bijna 20 eeuwen elkaar nog steeds herkennen in alle culturen, tijden, plaatsen & migrantengroepen.
To begin with (Reza Aslan@XXVI), with the possible exception of the gospel of Luke, none of these stories we have were written by the person after whom they are named?
That actually is true of most of the books in the NOT: such so-called pseudoepigraphical works, or works attributed to but not written by a specific author, were extremely common in the ancient world and should by no means be thought of as forgeries!
Naming a book after a person was a standard way of reflecting that person's beliefs or representing his or her school of thought.
Regardless, these gospels are not, nor we're they ever meant to be, a historical documentation of Yehoshua's life: these are not eye-witness accounts of YESHUA's Words & Deeds recorded by people who knew him; they are testimonies of FAITH composed by communities of faith & written many years after the events they pretend to describe?!
Simply put: the gospel (euangels) tell us about Yesh the Christ, Messiah, prophet, son of man & therefore also 'child of g d' like àll of us ...
Net zoals ieder myDi'ertje zingt, spreekt, loopt, leert, werkt, doet, laat & uitprobeert: zo (ongeveer) óók presenteerde Yesj zich als ont-dekkingsreiziger, herder- & bouwvakker, klusjes- & timmerman, zwerver & boer, zoon, neef, oom, zwager (?) van mensen zoals 'wij'; vandaar dat we na bijna 20 eeuwen elkaar nog steeds herkennen in alle culturen, tijden, plaatsen & migrantengroepen.
16 sep 2014 - bewerkt op 17 sep 2014
- meld ongepast verhaal
Log in om een reactie te plaatsen.
- O 17 dec 2025 50265 Het BEGIN van deze spreuk herinnert ons aan
- O 16 dec 2025 50264 72 DE GEDACHTE dat iemand zich eerst met z’n
- O 16 dec 2025 50263 DE BESTE SAMENVATTING van deze nieuwe Joodse
- O 15 dec 2025 50262 In die kringen waar de nieuwe Joodse ge-
- O 15 dec 2025 50261 OOK HIERIN WAS DUS telkens weer te lezen dat
- O 14 dec 2025 50260 71 Vanwege de moeilijkheid te weten hoe vèr
- O 14 dec 2025 50259 Het was niet dìt probleem dat deze revolutie
- O 13 dec 2025 50258 70 Die uitspraken zijn kenmerkend voor deze
- O 13 dec 2025 50257 69/5 Liefde: dé kiem van revolutie in Yesj’
- O 13 dec 2025 50256666768 In deze woorden van YESJ is de profeet
- O 12 dec 2025 50255 In elk geval genas YESJ in de regel nog geen
- O 12 dec 2025 50254 Voor een volledig begrip van al deze woorden
- O 12 dec 2025 50253 Voorzover we uit de bronnen opmaken had YESJ
- O 11 dec 2025 50252De liberale school van Hillel had er nog geen
- O 11 dec 2025 50251 De Afschaffing v/d Joodse Wetten tijdens die