jbml thln 60 in other cases, initiative & response
ARE
HANDLED SEPARATELY,
SO THAT THE USER'S EMAILPROGRAM
MUST SEND AND RECEIVE EMAIL VIA DISTINCT SOFTWARE ENTITIES
THAT OFTEN OPERATE BY COMMECTING TO DIFFERENT REMOTE MACHINES?
The computer's software-based abilities are usually divided into Client Programs
that request and accept services from other programs {often at the behest of a user},
& Server Programs that accept these requests & provide an appropriate service!
At the human level, when Martin at computer A sends email to Jonathan at computer B containing the line 'I am happy to speak to you' & Jonathan replies, 'And I am happy to speak to you,' we easily sort out the meaning of the words "I" & "You" in this polar relationship from context!? But, even in the siMplest case in which both computers handle their own email delivery (without relying on external ser-vice providers, as most private internet users must do), the relay of the messages & reply involves six steps among four connected but independently functioning software entities. [Here again I, Mor, have to skip some stuff because it seems to boring to me with all these computers speaking to each other through delivery of email message & delivery of email reply via A><B vice versa {123456}!] These features of the internet ~ the division of client & server functions into separate software entities & the consistent use of third person identification ~ are not necessary requirements of the machine communication, but are intended to make the Internet a robust "open system" in which machines can communicate without any prior formal acquaintance. Many common systems function by invoking first & second person formulations, so that for example, if Martin's computer & Jonathan's computer have been properly introduced to one an-other, they can exchange email messages by respectively announcing, "I have an email message for you," & "I have a reply message for you,"!? In that case, in any message arriving on a network cable, the word 'I' refers to the sender & 'You' refers to the software that accepts the message, while the opposite associations hold for messages leaving leaving on the network cable. Nevertheless, it would be an unreasonable stretch to argue that the computer invoking the word "I" has unified its fragmented experience into a consistent subjective ego. [I, Mor, hate it when 'advertisementprograms' 'talk' to me all the time by pretending I need their commercial offers ...]!
Asih, man, 80 jaar
Log in om een reactie te plaatsen.
-
O
24 jun 2024
47707Ook ik moet bij dit myDiverhaal denken aan ‘t
-
O
24 jun 2024
47706155Dus in tegenstelling tot Sjmoe’ël, die was
-
O
23 jun 2024
47705 Dawiedewiedewied, De Tegenkoning voor onze
-
O
23 jun 2024
47704 154 Na ruim vier uur lezen & praten neemt Ad
-
O
23 jun 2024
47703 In ‘t Bijbelboek Sjmoe’el breekt de tijd aan
-
O
23 jun 2024
47702 Maar in het Verhaal is ‘t niet de Rechter…
-
O
23 jun 2024
47701152 De Profeet Sjmoe’el? ‘t Verhaal van David
-
O
22 jun 2024
47700151 In de Verhalen van en over YÈSJ in ‘t NOT
-
O
22 jun 2024
47699150/12Dawiedewiedewied, koning van Israël: zó
-
O
22 jun 2024
47698Is Mo dan wel zo’n heilige? Ook hij werd toch
-
O
22 jun 2024
47697149 BB, vanaf het Haegs Hubertusduin reageer
-
O
22 jun 2024
47696 Ik wil, zoals je weet, begrijpen in welke
-
O
21 jun 2024
47695 Mosjeh, Matai, Lama: waaròm, wanneer, hoe èn
-
O
20 jun 2024
47694148 G d is bij ‘m & ZÈGT: “Dit is ‘t Lànd dat
-
O
20 jun 2024
47693 Het Verhaal van Mosjeh & z’n Volk is dus ook
vorige
volgende