jbml thln 42/76 "[I]f time travel of this type
WERE POSSIBLE:"
I (JB) am reminded, first,
of something you said to me in our college days
~ that history really should make as much sense going back-ward as forward.
This has stood me well, & in fact much of my ethnography POLISH JEWS IN PARIS was an effort
to tell the history of a generation of immigrants backward from the time of my fieldwork encounter with them.
More personally,
I have occasionally speculated,
or tried to comfort myself, with the thought that the past is such a rich country
I need not sorrow overmuch as my personal future or the world's shrinks in relation to that past
that remains infinitely discoverable.
Yet such thoughts seem unworthy historicist self-numbings, precisely the nostalgic temptation Walter Benjamin warned against.
Should they be banned as an ethisticization of history, inimiquel to its real politicization?
Or should we historicize Benjamin as well,
noting the desperation that lead to his bombastic rhetoric
about taking a
"TIGER'S LEAP INTO THE PAST,"
avoiding
"HISTORICISM'S BORDELLO,"
and being
"MAN ENOUGH TO BLAST OPEN
THE CONTINUUM
OF HISTORY?"
If we criticize him less
because of the desperation
of his circumstances, how shall we
evaluate the desperation
of our
own?
I (JB) am reminded, first,
of something you said to me in our college days
~ that history really should make as much sense going back-ward as forward.
This has stood me well, & in fact much of my ethnography POLISH JEWS IN PARIS was an effort
to tell the history of a generation of immigrants backward from the time of my fieldwork encounter with them.
More personally,
I have occasionally speculated,
or tried to comfort myself, with the thought that the past is such a rich country
I need not sorrow overmuch as my personal future or the world's shrinks in relation to that past
that remains infinitely discoverable.
Yet such thoughts seem unworthy historicist self-numbings, precisely the nostalgic temptation Walter Benjamin warned against.
Should they be banned as an ethisticization of history, inimiquel to its real politicization?
Or should we historicize Benjamin as well,
noting the desperation that lead to his bombastic rhetoric
about taking a
"TIGER'S LEAP INTO THE PAST,"
avoiding
"HISTORICISM'S BORDELLO,"
and being
"MAN ENOUGH TO BLAST OPEN
THE CONTINUUM
OF HISTORY?"
If we criticize him less
because of the desperation
of his circumstances, how shall we
evaluate the desperation
of our
own?
12 mrt 2013 - bewerkt op 14 mrt 2013
- meld ongepast verhaal
Log in om een reactie te plaatsen.
- O 20 apr 2023 44280259Hoogstmerkwaardig hoeveel soorten dromen &
- O 19 apr 2023 44279258OudeLiedjes,JoligeMelodietjes,MallePietjes
- O 19 apr 2023 44278 257 Zo’n 400 jaar later, in 386 na Chr./A.D.
- O 19 apr 2023 44277Knijp droog, verdeel, heers & pest maar raak?
- O 19 apr 2023 44276256Ondergronds, uit ‘t licht, was geen moeite
- O 19 apr 2023 44275 255 Nòg frappanter (tenminste, voor wie niet
- O 18 apr 2023 44274 254 In Vigna Randanini zijn echter kochiem
- O 18 apr 2023 44273 253 I/d 2e/3e eeuw, toen twee rivaliserende
- O 17 apr 2023 44268252 Vroege synagogen waren dus zeker geen
- O 17 apr 2023 44267 251 De namen i/d Misjna zíjn die van wijzen
- O 16 apr 2023 44266 Met àndere woorden: de prachtige, overvolle
- O 16 apr 2023 44265 250 De tekens die om een menselijke figuur
- O 16 apr 2023 44264249 Áán ‘t uiteinde v/d synagogevloer die het
- O 16 apr 2023 44263 248 Geen v/d voorstellingen was willekeurig
- O 16 apr 2023 44262 247 Moderne Joden groeien op met de aanname