jbml thln 22d what is the ontology


of
"having been?"

IS IT POSSIBLE
FOR ALL SPEAKERS ONLY
"TO HAVE BEEN," IF THERE
IS NO ONE TO SPEAK AND THUS
TO MAKE THEM "BE"
(AGAIN)?

AND ONE
(EVEN GOD!)
WOULDN'T BE ENOUGH
FOR US TO HAVE BEEN, I SUPPOSE, SINCE
(IN JABÈS' FORMULATION)
ONE MUST SPEAK FOR
ANOTHER TO
BE.

IF
THERE IS
NO PAIR OF SPEAKERS AT LAST
(NO LAST COUPLE,
STARING BACKWARD AT ADAM AND EVE)
WILL IT BE AS THOUGH ALL OF US, EVEN THE RENOWNED AMONG US, "HAD NEVER BEEN,"
kilo hayu,
AS THE MORNING
PRAYER HAS
IT?
04 mrt 2013 - bewerkt op 05 mrt 2013 - meld ongepast verhaal
Weet je zeker dat je dit verhaal wilt rapporteren? Ja | Nee
Profielfoto van Asih
Asih, man, 81 jaar
   
Log in om een reactie te plaatsen.   vorige volgende