jbml thln_004 (Martin) Julia Kristeva is here,
but that will have to wait a bit to be articulated.
By your act of hospitality - by making room for my words at your table - you accept the obligation to hear my narrative,
but also to suffer my narrative style, which will be difficult to follow unless I first explain my use of certain ideas from theoretical physics, especially time, space, interaction, and prediction.
Although my original intention was or quickly introduce a few abstract terms for later use, this digression has ballooned into several pages of occasionally dense discourse, and while the conclusions are relevant to our broader topic, the discussion itself may appear as something of a long detour.
The divergence between intent and outcome can be attributed to a teacher's narcissistic impulse to explain, or (equivalently?) to an ir-resistible anxiety that these conclusions, taken out of context and without simple examples, will give the impression of magic or super-stition. As an aid in reading the full discussion, or perhaps an alternative, I will first summarize my main conclusions. The purpose of the following section is to establish how contemporary physics grounds itself in these claims:
1. Physics builds models from three ingredients: idealized entities, relationships that characterize interaction among these entities, and physical principles that connect seemingly independent changes in these relationships over time. When the analog of an empirical phenomenon can be recognized in a model, the model is said to explain the phenomenon, despite numerous problems of interpretation that belong to philosophy of science.
2. Spatial and temporal distances are largely equivalent forms of separation. The quantitative expression of physical interactions often depends on the physical configuration, that is, on how objects are separated in space-time.
By your act of hospitality - by making room for my words at your table - you accept the obligation to hear my narrative,
but also to suffer my narrative style, which will be difficult to follow unless I first explain my use of certain ideas from theoretical physics, especially time, space, interaction, and prediction.
Although my original intention was or quickly introduce a few abstract terms for later use, this digression has ballooned into several pages of occasionally dense discourse, and while the conclusions are relevant to our broader topic, the discussion itself may appear as something of a long detour.
The divergence between intent and outcome can be attributed to a teacher's narcissistic impulse to explain, or (equivalently?) to an ir-resistible anxiety that these conclusions, taken out of context and without simple examples, will give the impression of magic or super-stition. As an aid in reading the full discussion, or perhaps an alternative, I will first summarize my main conclusions. The purpose of the following section is to establish how contemporary physics grounds itself in these claims:
1. Physics builds models from three ingredients: idealized entities, relationships that characterize interaction among these entities, and physical principles that connect seemingly independent changes in these relationships over time. When the analog of an empirical phenomenon can be recognized in a model, the model is said to explain the phenomenon, despite numerous problems of interpretation that belong to philosophy of science.
2. Spatial and temporal distances are largely equivalent forms of separation. The quantitative expression of physical interactions often depends on the physical configuration, that is, on how objects are separated in space-time.
05 mrt 2013 - bewerkt op 06 mrt 2013
- meld ongepast verhaal
Log in om een reactie te plaatsen.
- O 02 apr 2018 31305gkbvo5146 Poeriem Mordechai Esther Perzië etc
- O 02 apr 2018 31302gkbvo5145 Dáár, in de woestijn van EDOM, ~~~~
- O 02 apr 2018 31301gkbvo5144 tóen beging Yosjafat z'n volgende ~
- O 02 apr 2018 31300gkbvo5143 toen mijn Yóràm hem dan ook ~~~~~~~
- O 01 apr 2018 31297gkbvo6143 mijn zoon, Yóràm, de kóning van ~~~
- O 01 apr 2018 31296gkbvo5141b/antipropagandanepnieuwshogwashshit
- O 01 apr 2018 31295gkbvo5140b wie dàt praetje blijft geloven ~~~
- O 01 apr 2018 31294gkbvo5139b ik kan 't niet beschrijven, maar ~
- O 01 apr 2018 31293gkbvo5138bpoetinerdogantrumpbibibaba&bubuNIKS
- O 31 mrt 2018 31292gkbvo5138mijn jongste zoon, de dappere Yóràm,
- O 31 mrt 2018 31291gkbvo5137b Ik wil niet zeuren, maar wáár.....
- O 31 mrt 2018 31290gkbvo5137 Athaliyah vertrok gemelijk ~~~~~~~~
- O 31 mrt 2018 31289gkbvo5136 zó wàs het, Prìns, níemand kàn ~~~~
- O 31 mrt 2018 31288gkbvo5135 Yóràm aarzelde? Ik keek hèm nu níet
- O 31 mrt 2018 31287gkbvo5134 de allergrootste dagelijkse ellende