I do think I understand
79c jbml thln
FROM
YOUR ACCOUNT
OF STUECKELBERG's NOTION
OF HISTORICAL SEQUENCE, WHY "I cannot affect the historical past"
(which is presumably why the dramatic-tension premises of BACK TO THE FUTURE
were so unconvincing if you thought about them
hard enough).
Page 48/80:
"IN THE EVOLVING SPACE-TIME,
THE PAST EXISTS ONLY IN MEMORY,
THE FUTURE EXISTS ONLY IN POTENTIAL, AND CHANGE IS ALWAYS POSSIBLE:"
Does the confusion lie in the common tendency to think of going back into the past as going back into the past as going back "in history," whereas you are saying that even if you could move in either direction along the temporal dimension of a fixed universe, "historical" time only moves forward? I (JOBO) think so. Yes,
this does seem to be what you are saying here.
About a week ago my son Jonah reported me that, as he was drifting off to sleep, he thought of writing his "memoirs" -
the account of an entire life - now, based on memory
up until the present and constructed
"fictionally" from this present on.
FROM
YOUR ACCOUNT
OF STUECKELBERG's NOTION
OF HISTORICAL SEQUENCE, WHY "I cannot affect the historical past"
(which is presumably why the dramatic-tension premises of BACK TO THE FUTURE
were so unconvincing if you thought about them
hard enough).
Page 48/80:
"IN THE EVOLVING SPACE-TIME,
THE PAST EXISTS ONLY IN MEMORY,
THE FUTURE EXISTS ONLY IN POTENTIAL, AND CHANGE IS ALWAYS POSSIBLE:"
Does the confusion lie in the common tendency to think of going back into the past as going back into the past as going back "in history," whereas you are saying that even if you could move in either direction along the temporal dimension of a fixed universe, "historical" time only moves forward? I (JOBO) think so. Yes,
this does seem to be what you are saying here.
About a week ago my son Jonah reported me that, as he was drifting off to sleep, he thought of writing his "memoirs" -
the account of an entire life - now, based on memory
up until the present and constructed
"fictionally" from this present on.
13 mrt 2013 - bewerkt op 15 mrt 2013
- meld ongepast verhaal
Log in om een reactie te plaatsen.
- O 30 dec 2013 @dunkelheit dank! In '54 verloor Onoda z'n 2e man:
- O 30 dec 2013 Je vous ai compris, Schicklgrubers, Fascistenazi's
- O 30 dec 2013 lrscah40/41abc hoewel 't wáár is dat in die begin-
- O 29 dec 2013 lrscah40 in aug. '21 had ah inmiddels alleenheer-
- O 29 dec 2013 lrscah39b over de vraag hoe toekomstige nazibonzen
- O 29 dec 2013 lrscah38b toen Herbert Richter veteraan uit WO II,
- O 29 dec 2013 Die AH-opvatting werd gedeeld door Otto Strasser,
- O 29 dec 2013 lrscah37 ook legde ah zich erop toe om het leven ~
- O 29 dec 2013 lrscah36 hg: 'AH sprak over Versailles & zei dat ~
- O 29 dec 2013 lrscah35: toen hij AH voor 't eerst sprak ~~~~~~~~
- O 29 dec 2013 lrs/cah'34 de oprechtheid die Velen i/d AHredenaar
- O 29 dec 2013 Back to our Future via '22, '33, '44, '55, '66/'77
- O 28 dec 2013 In het jaar 444 bce las Ezrah op grote verzoendag
- O 28 dec 2013 Als gevolg van literatuurstudie, gebed, lezingen &
- O 28 dec 2013 Georganiseerde illegale crimineeltjes spreiden hun