34792Y122That's Why The Theory of Evolution Cannot

Q&@

ACCEPT THE
IDEA OF SOULS,
AT LEAST IF BY 'soul'
we mean something indivisible, immutable
and potentially eternal. Such an entity cannot possible result
from a step-by-step evolution. Natural selection could produce a human eye,
because the eye hàs pàrts! But the soul has no parts! If the Sapiens soul evolved step by step
from the Erectus soul, what exactly were those steps! Is there some part of the soul that is more developed
in Sapiens than in Erectus! But the soul has no parts ...... You might argue that human souls did not evolve,
but appeared one bright day in the fullness of their glory. But when exactly wàs thàt brìght day!? We we look
closely at the evolution of humankind, it is embarrassingly difficult to find it! Every human that ever existed
came into being as a result of male sperm inseminating a female egg. [INCLUDING YEHOSJOEA VIA YOSEEF
AND OR 'PANTERA'!] Think of the first baby to possess a soul! That baby was very similar tot her father and
mother, except that she had a soul and they didn't? Our biological knowledge can certainly explain the birth
of a baby whose cornea was a bit more curved than her parents' corneas. A slight mutation in a single gene
can account for that. But biology cannot explain the birth of a baby possessing an eternal soul from parents
who did nòt have even a shred of a soul! Is a single mutation, or even several mutations, enough to give an
animal an essence secure against all changes,
including even death?

08 jun 2019 - bewerkt op 11 jun 2019 - meld ongepast verhaal
Weet je zeker dat je dit verhaal wilt rapporteren? Ja | Nee
Profielfoto van Asih
Asih, man, 81 jaar
   
Log in om een reactie te plaatsen.   vorige volgende