34550Y123WeCanDoAllThisBecause The Eye IsComposed

OF MANY DIFFERENT PARTS!
If every few generaties a small mutation
slightly changes ONE of these parts ~ say,
the cornea becomes a bit more curved ~ after
millions of generations these changes can result
in a human eye?! If the eye were a holistic entity,
devoid of any parts, it could never have evolved by
natural selection... That's why the theory of evolution
cannot accept the idea of souls, at least if by 'SOUL' we
mean something indivisible, immutable & potentially eternal.
Such an identity cannot possibly result from a step-by-step evolution.
Natural selection could produce a human eye, because the eye has parts......!
But the soul has no parts? Ìf the Sapiens soul evolved step by step from the Erectus soul,
what exactly were these steps? Is there some part of the soul that is more developed in Sapiens
than in Erectus? But the soul has no parts. You might argue that human souls did not evolve, but
appeared one bright day in the fullness of their glory? But whèn exactly wàs thàt brìght dáy??
When we look closely at the evolution of human kind, it ìs embarrassingly difficult to find it.
Every human that ever existed came into being as a result of male sperm inseminating a
female egg. Think of the first baby to possess a soul! That baby was very similar to her
mother & father, except that she had a soul and they didn't. Our biological knowledge
can certainly explain explain the birth of a baby whose cornea was a bit more curved
than her parents' corneas. Just as Yeshua's birth can have different active 'fathers':
ABBA, YOSHUA, PATHERA ETCETERARA?! A slight mutation in a single gene can
account for that. But biology cannot explain the birth of a baby possessing a
kind of 'eternal soul' from parents who did not have even a shred of a soul!
In a single mutation, or even several mutations, enough to give an animal
an essence secure against all changes, including even death?
Hence the existence of souls
cannot be squared with
the theory of
evolution!
Só:
evolution means
change, & is incapable of producing
everlasting entities. From an evolutionary
perspective, the closest thing we have to a human
ÈSSENCE ÌS OUR DNA, AND THE DNA MOLECULE ÌS
THÉ VERY VEHICLE ÒF MUTATION RATHER THAN THE SEAT OF
ETERNITY. THIS TERRIFIES LARGE NUMBERS OF PEOPLE, WHO
DO PREFER TO REJECT THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION
RATHER THAN GIVE UP THEIR SOULS? Thus: we can
suppose "G D'S Great Spirit in the sky" As Much As
fictional reality as Yoshua naming 'his' Yehoshua as
being Ben Panthera's son probably 'adopted' by Yosh
as Miryam's 'son', Son of DAWEDEWEDEWEED,
DAWEED OR HOLY SPIRIT, G D'S LAMB,
THE "SOMANIEST COMING" or
whatever other imaginary
'imagination' of
an Imagined
'Mary'?!

29 apr 2019 - bewerkt op 03 mei 2019 - meld ongepast verhaal
Weet je zeker dat je dit verhaal wilt rapporteren? Ja | Nee
Profielfoto van Asih
Asih, man, 80 jaar
   
Log in om een reactie te plaatsen.   vorige volgende