2936218YS if these results are valid - and it's ~~
Q
IMPORTANT
TO KEEP IN MIND
THAT FURTHER RESEARCH
IS UNDER WAY AND MAY EITHER
REINFORCE OR MODIFY THESE CONCLUSIONS -
THE INTERBREEDERS GOT AT LEAST SOME THINGS RIGHT?!
But that doesn't mean that the Replacement Theory is completely wrong!
Since Neanderthals and Denisovans contributed only a small amount of DNA to our present-day
genome, it ìs impossible to speak of a 'merger' between Sapiens & other human species?
Although differences between them were not large enough to completely prevent fertile intercourse,
they were sufficient to make such contacts very rare. Hòw then should we understand the biological
relatedness of Sapiens, Neanderthals and Denisovans? Clearly, they were nòt còmplétely different
species like horses and donkeys. On the other hand, they were not just different populations
of the same species, like bulldogs & spaniels. Biological reality ìs nòt blàck & whíte!
There are also important grey areas. Every two species that evolved from a common ancestor,
such as horses & donkeys, wère at one time just two populations of the same species, like bulldogs
& spaniels. There must have been a point when the two populations were already quite different
from one another, bùt stìll capable on rare occasions of having sex ànd producing fertile offspring?!
Then another mutation severed this last connecting thread, & they went their sèperate evolutionary
ways!? It seems that about 50.000 years ago, Sapiens, Neanderthals & Denisovans wère àt thàt
borderline point. They were almost, but not quite, entirely separate species. As we'll see, Sapiens
were already very different from Neanderthals & Denisovans nòt only in their genetic code
& physical traits, but also in their cognitive & social abilities, yet it appears it was still just possible,
on rare occasions, for a Sapiens & a Neanderthal
to produce a fertile offspring...
Asih, man, 80 jaar
Log in om een reactie te plaatsen.
-
O
25 jun 2024
47709157 ‘t Wereldberoemd Verhaal Van Goliat Lezen
-
O
24 jun 2024
47708156 Ondertussen werd Sja’oel overweldigd door
-
O
24 jun 2024
47707Ook ik moet bij dit myDiverhaal denken aan ‘t
-
O
24 jun 2024
47706155Dus in tegenstelling tot Sjmoe’ël, die was
-
O
23 jun 2024
47705 Dawiedewiedewied, De Tegenkoning voor onze
-
O
23 jun 2024
47704 154 Na ruim vier uur lezen & praten neemt Ad
-
O
23 jun 2024
47703 In ‘t Bijbelboek Sjmoe’el breekt de tijd aan
-
O
23 jun 2024
47702 Maar in het Verhaal is ‘t niet de Rechter…
-
O
23 jun 2024
47701152 De Profeet Sjmoe’el? ‘t Verhaal van David
-
O
22 jun 2024
47700151 In de Verhalen van en over YÈSJ in ‘t NOT
-
O
22 jun 2024
47699150/12Dawiedewiedewied, koning van Israël: zó
-
O
22 jun 2024
47698Is Mo dan wel zo’n heilige? Ook hij werd toch
-
O
22 jun 2024
47697149 BB, vanaf het Haegs Hubertusduin reageer
-
O
22 jun 2024
47696 Ik wil, zoals je weet, begrijpen in welke
-
O
21 jun 2024
47695 Mosjeh, Matai, Lama: waaròm, wanneer, hoe èn
vorige
volgende