1001 messiassen, maitreya's, Mahdi's & 'magicians'
XXIV REZA ASLAN'S ZEALOT: Another messianic aspirant, simply called "the Samaritan," was crucified by Pontius Pilate even though he hadn't raised any 'army' & in no way challenged Rome ~ an indication that the authorities, sensing again an apocalyptic fever in the air, once more had become extremely sensitive to any hint of sedition.
There was for instance Hezekiah (Chazakyahu) the bandit chief, one Simon of Peraea, Judas the Galilean, hìs grandson Menahem, Simon son of Giora, & Simon son of Kochba ~ àll of whom declared mes-sianic ambitions ànd àll of whom were executed by Rome precisely for 'doing so'!?
Add to this long list of possible pretenders also the Essene sect, some of whose members lived in seclusion atop the dry plateau of Qumran on the northwestern shore of the Dead Sea; a first-century Jewish revolutionary party known as the Zealots, who helped launch a bloody war against Rome; and the fearsome bandit assassins whom the Romans dubbed the Sicarii {the Daggermen}, & the picture that thus emerges of first-century Palestine ìs quite of an era awash in messianic energy?!
It is difficult to place Yehoshua of Natseret aka haMashiach squarely within any of these more or less well known religiopolitical move-ments if this time!? He was a man of profound contradictions, one day preaching a message of racial exclusion ("I was sent solely to the lost sheep of Israel" in Matthew 15:24), the next, of benevolent universalism ("Go and make disciples of all nations" in Matthew 28: 19); sometimes calling for unconditional peace ("Blessed are the peacemakers for they shall be called the sons of God" in Matai 5:9), sometimes promoting violence & conflict ("If you do not have a sword, go sell your cloak & buy one" in Lucky Luke 22:36)!
The problem with this 'pinning down' an "historical Yeshua" is that, outside of the "New Testament", there is almost no trace of the man who would so permanently alter the course of human history?
[Wat Mor betreft doen alle verschillende mensen er 'hun eigen gooi naar': men ziet wat men graag wìl zien & wijst àf wat men 'niet ziet zitten'! In de millennia 'daarvoor' vonden al eerder vele dergelijke mixages plaats tussen culturen, sekten, stammen & migranten met HÙN versies van goden & godinnen, voorkeur & afkeer van geweld & 't tegendeel!!
En nú 2000 jaar later spelen ongeveer dezelfde 'uitersten' & 'overeenkomsten' mee in 'alle landen': 'n zaak van extreme in- & output??]
There was for instance Hezekiah (Chazakyahu) the bandit chief, one Simon of Peraea, Judas the Galilean, hìs grandson Menahem, Simon son of Giora, & Simon son of Kochba ~ àll of whom declared mes-sianic ambitions ànd àll of whom were executed by Rome precisely for 'doing so'!?
Add to this long list of possible pretenders also the Essene sect, some of whose members lived in seclusion atop the dry plateau of Qumran on the northwestern shore of the Dead Sea; a first-century Jewish revolutionary party known as the Zealots, who helped launch a bloody war against Rome; and the fearsome bandit assassins whom the Romans dubbed the Sicarii {the Daggermen}, & the picture that thus emerges of first-century Palestine ìs quite of an era awash in messianic energy?!
It is difficult to place Yehoshua of Natseret aka haMashiach squarely within any of these more or less well known religiopolitical move-ments if this time!? He was a man of profound contradictions, one day preaching a message of racial exclusion ("I was sent solely to the lost sheep of Israel" in Matthew 15:24), the next, of benevolent universalism ("Go and make disciples of all nations" in Matthew 28: 19); sometimes calling for unconditional peace ("Blessed are the peacemakers for they shall be called the sons of God" in Matai 5:9), sometimes promoting violence & conflict ("If you do not have a sword, go sell your cloak & buy one" in Lucky Luke 22:36)!
The problem with this 'pinning down' an "historical Yeshua" is that, outside of the "New Testament", there is almost no trace of the man who would so permanently alter the course of human history?
[Wat Mor betreft doen alle verschillende mensen er 'hun eigen gooi naar': men ziet wat men graag wìl zien & wijst àf wat men 'niet ziet zitten'! In de millennia 'daarvoor' vonden al eerder vele dergelijke mixages plaats tussen culturen, sekten, stammen & migranten met HÙN versies van goden & godinnen, voorkeur & afkeer van geweld & 't tegendeel!!
En nú 2000 jaar later spelen ongeveer dezelfde 'uitersten' & 'overeenkomsten' mee in 'alle landen': 'n zaak van extreme in- & output??]
06 mei 2014 - bewerkt op 04 jun 2014
- meld ongepast verhaal
Log in om een reactie te plaatsen.
- O 17 dec 2025 50269 Zowel YESJ als eerder Hillel beschouwden die
- O 17 dec 2025 50268Toch vreselijk komisch dat zo’n Romeins legi-
- O 17 dec 2025 50267 74 Bij de joden werd ‘t, zelfs al vóór YESJ’
- O 17 dec 2025 50266 73 De thema’s waarin de nieuwe gevoeligheid
- O 17 dec 2025 50265 Het BEGIN van deze spreuk herinnert ons aan
- O 16 dec 2025 50264 72 DE GEDACHTE dat iemand zich eerst met z’n
- O 16 dec 2025 50263 DE BESTE SAMENVATTING van deze nieuwe Joodse
- O 15 dec 2025 50262 In die kringen waar de nieuwe Joodse ge-
- O 15 dec 2025 50261 OOK HIERIN WAS DUS telkens weer te lezen dat
- O 14 dec 2025 50260 71 Vanwege de moeilijkheid te weten hoe vèr
- O 14 dec 2025 50259 Het was niet dìt probleem dat deze revolutie
- O 13 dec 2025 50258 70 Die uitspraken zijn kenmerkend voor deze
- O 13 dec 2025 50257 69/5 Liefde: dé kiem van revolutie in Yesj’
- O 13 dec 2025 50256666768 In deze woorden van YESJ is de profeet
- O 12 dec 2025 50255 In elk geval genas YESJ in de regel nog geen